🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a bill raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some figures to copy this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this international discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are less and less willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.