🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.