🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions regarding the remarks delivered by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the continued absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Even if the American defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on both front side and backhand are more than adequate to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

The American star made a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use far too much effort to win it. Down match points in the final game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz told an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly unlikely for all other players. {